Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:16:57.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bucharest at the Crossroads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

When, at the beginning of the twentieth century, bucharest was called “little Paris,” the nickname implicitly measured the distance that Romania had covered on the road to modernization and westernization. The process was slow, because there were huge discrepancies between the efforts of a minority elite pushing for the entrance of the country “into Europe” and the indifference of a majority population with minimal standards of living. Despite important events favorable to the country's development—the union of the Romanian principalities (Moldavia and Walachia) in 1859 and its independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1878—Romania was, for most of the nineteenth century, still a province of the Ottoman Empire.

Type
Correspondents at large BUCHAREST
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Sorin, Antohi. Exercitiul distantei. Discursuri, societati, metode. Bucuresti: Nemira, 1998. Antohi, Sorin. “Romania and the Balkans: From Geocultural Bovarism to Ethnic Ontology.” Tr@nsit Online 21 (2002). 18 Oct. 2006 <http://iwm.at/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=235&Itemid=411>.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin. The Arcades Project. Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Blowitz, Opper de. Une course à Constantinople. Paris: Plon, 1884.Google Scholar
Caragiale, Mateiu I. Craii de Curtea-Veche. Opere. Ed. Cioculescu, Barbu. Bucuresti: Univers Enciclopedic, 2001.Google Scholar
Cioran, Émile. “La tragédie des petites cultures.” Trans. Alain Paruit. Seine et Danube 1 (2003): 2559.Google Scholar
Cuisinier, Jean. Mémoire des Carpathes. La Roumanie millénaire: Un regard intérieur. Paris: Plon, 2000.Google Scholar
Dominique, Fernandez. Rhapsodie roumaine. Paris: Grasset, 1998.Google Scholar
Magris, Claudio. Danube. 1986. Trans. Patrick Creagh. New York: Farrar, 1989.Google Scholar
Marsillac, Ulysse de. Bucurestiul in veacul al XIX-lea. Ed. and pref. Adrian-Silvan Ionescu. Trans. Elena Radulescu. Bucuresti: Meridiane, 1999.Google Scholar
Morand, Paul. Bucarest. Paris: Plon, 1935.Google Scholar
Moüy, Charles de. Lettres du Bosphore. Bucarest—Constantinople—Athènes. Paris: Plon, 1879.Google Scholar
Pippidi, Andrei. Bucuresti: Istorie si urbanism. Bucuresti: Domino, 2002.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. Travel Writing and Transculturation. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
Verona, Roxana. “Cosmopolitan Orientalism: Paul Morand Goes East.” Sites: The Journal of Twentieth Century/Contemporary Studies 5 (2001): 157–69.Google Scholar
Wolff, Larry. Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1994.Google Scholar