Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:49:32.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dostoevsky and the Novel-Tragedy: Genre and Modernity in Ivanov, Pumpyansky, and Bakhtin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ilya Kliger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The early-twentieth-century Russian debate on the place of tragedy in Dostoevsky's novels included interventions by the leading figure of the symbolist movement in Russia, Vyacheslav Ivanov; by the philosophically minded literary historian Lev Pumpyansky; and by the author of the most formidable analysis of Dostoevsky's poetics to date, Mikhail Bakhtin. From the perspective of a certain widespread vision of modernity, the project of thinking the modern novel and tragedy together is paradoxical. It is thus noteworthy that such a project seemed urgent to major Russian intellectuals in the 1910s and 1920s and that it frequently relied on the articulation of an implicitly exceptionalist narrative about Russian modernity and its proper forms. Additionally, staging the three-way debate among Ivanov, Pumpyansky, and Bakhtin allows us to see that Bakhtin's reading of Dostoevsky as a modern novelist par excellence is conceptually tied to the largely occluded theory of the tragic.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 126 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 73 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bakhtin, Mikhail. “Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity.” Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Ed. Holquist, Michael and Liapunov, Vadim. Trans. Liapunov. Austin: Texas UP, 1990. 4–256. Print.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. “Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Holquist. Austin: Texas UP, 1981. 259–422. Print.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and trans. Emerson, Caryl. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. . Bakhtin, 2:11–175.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. . Ed. S. G. Bočarov and N. I. Nikolaev. 7 vols. Moskva: Russkie slovari, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Trans. Harry Zohn. Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Bird, Robert. The Russian Prospero: The Creative Universe of Vyacheslav Ivanov. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst. Heritage of Our Times. Trans. Neville Plaice and Stephen Plaice. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Bočarov, S. G. Commentary. Bakhtin, 2:428–506.Google Scholar
Brandist, Craig, Shepherd, David, and Tihanov, Galin, eds. The Bakhtin Circle in the Master's Absence. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Clark, Katerina, and Holquist, Michael. Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Clowes, Edith W. The Revolution of Moral Consciousness: Nietzsche in Russian Literature, 1890–1914. DeKalb: Northern Illinois UP, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Fridman, I. N. “.” . Ed. L. A. Gogotišvili and A. T. Kazarjan. Moskva: Russkie slovari, 1999. 250–85. Print.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes. A Theory of Modernity. Malden: Blackwell, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Igeta, Sadaiosi. 3–4 (2000): 5–18. Print.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. 401–36.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. “On the Crisis of Humanism: Towards a Morphology of Modern Culture and the Psychology of Modernity.” Ivanov, Selected Essays 163–74.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. . Menston: Scolar, 1971. 235–58. Print.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. “Presentiments and Portents: The New Organic Era and the Theatre of the Future.” Ivanov, Selected Essays 95–110.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. Selected Essays. Trans. Robert Bird. Ed. Michael Wachtel. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. . Vol. 4. Bruxelles: Foyer Oriental Chretien, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. . Vol. 2. SanktPeterburg: Novaja biblioteka poèta, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. “Two Elements in Contemporary Symbolism.” Ivanov, Selected Essays 13–35.Google Scholar
Keldyš, V. A. . Moskva: Nasledie, 1992. 76–115. Print.Google Scholar
Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. “The Eighteenth Century as the Beginning of Modernity.” The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Trans. Todd Samuel Presner et al. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002. 154–69. Print.Google Scholar
Kotrelev, N. Ed. L. A. Gogotišvili and A. T. Kazarjan. Moskva: Russkie slovari, 1999. 201–10. Print.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Theory of the Novel: A Historico-philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Trans. Anna Bostock. Cambridge: MIT P, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random, 1967. Print.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, N. I. 9–11 2002 . Tomsk: Vodolej, 2003. 286–94. Print.Google Scholar
Popova, I. L. Commentary. Bakhtin, 5:457–63.Google Scholar
Pumpjanskij, Lev. . Moskva: Iazyki russkoj kultury, 2000. 506–29. Print.Google Scholar
Pumpjanskij, Lev. . Moskva: Iazyki russkoj kultury, 2000. 564–75. Print.Google Scholar
Rood, Naomi. “Mediating the Distance: Prophecy and Alterity in Greek Tragedy and Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment.” Russian Literature and the Classics. Ed. Barta, Peter I., Larmour, David H. J., and Miller, Paul Allen. Amsterdam: Hawood Academic, 1996. 35–58. Print.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. “The Concept and Tragedy of Culture.” “The Conflict in Modern Culture” and Other Essays. Trans. K. Peter Etzkorn. New York: Teachers Coll. P, 1968. 11–46. Print.Google Scholar
Tamarčenko, N. D. . Ed. A. A. Taxo-Godi and E. A. Taxo-Godi. Moskva: Nauka, 2002. 71–76. Print.Google Scholar
Tihanov, Galin. The Master and the Slave: Lukács, Bakhtin and the Ideas of Their Time. Oxford: Clarendon, 2000. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tihanov, Galin. “Voloshinov, Ideology, and Language: The Birth of Marxist Sociology from the Spirit of Lebensphilosophie.” Bakhtin/“Bakhtin”: Studies in the Archive and Beyond. Spec. issue of South Atlantic Quarterly 97.3–4 (1998): 599–621. Print.Google Scholar
Trockij, Lev. . Vol. 1. Moskva: Respublika, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jean-Pierre. “The Tragic Subject: Historicity and Transhistoricity.” Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. By Vernant and Pierre Vidal-Naquet. Trans. Janet Lloyd. New York: Zone, 1990. 237–48. Print.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. 5½. By Mikhail Bakhtin. Moskva: Labirint, 1996. 60–87. Print.Google Scholar
Wachtel, Michael. Russian Symbolism and Literary Tradition: Goethe, Novalis, and the Poetics of Vyacheslav Ivanov. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Zelinskij, Faddej. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteja, 1997. Print.Google Scholar