Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T23:06:04.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digital Networks and Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Paradoxical as it may appear, isn't it through the rights of man that transpires today—at a planetary level—the worst discriminations?

—Jean Baudrillard, Les mots de passe

Critical discourse today locates an antagonism between globalization and citizenship. The deepening of globalizing processes strips citizens of power, this position maintains. As economic processes become globalized, the nation-state loses its ability to protect its population. Citizens lose their ability to elect a leadership that effectively pursues their interests. When production facilities are dispersed beyond the nation, jobs are lost to foreigners, labor markets are affected by conditions in countries with diverse living standards, and capital flows, at the speed of light, to places of optimum returns. Consumption is also planetary in scope, bringing across borders alien cultural assumptions as embodied in commodities. The popular need no longer be the local. Although foreign goods are inflected with community values and easily adapted to local conditions, they remain indexes of otherness. What is more dramatic still than the changes in production and consumption, nation-states are losing their cultural coherence by dint of planetary communications systems. Much of contemporary music is global music or at least a fusion of diverse musical cultures. Satellite technology and the Internet bring all media across national boundaries as if those borders did not exist. Global processes run deep and wide, rendering problematic the figure of the citizen as a member of a national community.

Type
Talks from the Convention
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Balibar, Etienne. “Citizen Subject.” Who Comes after the Subject? Ed. Cadava, Eduardo, Connor, Peter, and Nancy, Jean-Luc. New York: Routledge, 1991. 3357.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. “Subjection and Subjectivation.” Supposing the Subject. Ed. Copjec, Joan. New York: Verso, 1994. 115.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Gurak, Laura J. Persuasion and Privacy in Cyberspace: The Online Protests over Lotus Marketplace and the Clipper Chip. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Lévy, Pierre. Collective Intelligence. New York: Plenum, 1997.Google Scholar
Rheingold, Howard. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Addison, 1993.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: New, 1998.Google Scholar
Steven, Spielberg, dir. Amistad. DreamWorks, 1997.Google Scholar