Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T20:48:28.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Afterlife of Feminist Criticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Sinead McDermott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In responding to the title of this roundtable, i was determined to do two things. First, i did not want to revisit the metaphors of illness and death offered by Susan Gubar as indicative of the state of feminist criticism in 1998. It is clear to me that feminist criticism and what we mean by that term are changing, but I also want to acknowledge the continued significance of this methodology for my own work. Feminist criticism works for me as a mode of literary analysis and as a way of seeing the world, and I am reluctant to offer a doomsday scenario for its future.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 121 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 1729 - 1734
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Belsey, Catherine, and Moore, Jane, eds. The Feminist Reader: Essays in Gender and the Politics of Literary Criticism. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave, 1997.10.1007/978-1-349-25621-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benstock, Shari, Ferriss, Suzanne, and Woods, Susanne, eds. A Handbook of Literary Feminisms. New York: Oxford UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Rosi, Braidotti. “Cyberfeminism with a Difference.” New Formations 29 (1996): 9–25. Rpt. in Kemp and Squires 520–29.Google Scholar
Mary, Eagleton, ed. Feminist Literary Theory: A Reader. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
Mary, Eagleton, ed. Figuring the Woman Author in Contemporary Fiction. London: Palgrave, 2005.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford. Mappings: Feminism and the Cultural Geographies of Encounter. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1998.10.1515/9781400822577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susan, Gubar. “What Ails Feminist Criticism?” Critical Inquiry 24 (1998): 878–902.Google Scholar
Janice, Haaken. Pillar of Salt: Gender, Memory, and the Perils of Looking Back. London: Free Assn., 1998.Google Scholar
Marianne, Hirsch. “Marked by Memory: Feminist Reflections on Trauma and Transmission.” Extremities: Trauma, Testimony, and Community. Ed. Miller, Nancy K. and Tougaw, Jason. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2002. 71–91.Google Scholar
Marianne, Hirsch. “Maternity and Rememory: Toni Morrison's Beloved.” Representations of Motherhood. Ed. Bassin, Donna, Honey, Margaret, and Kaplan, Meryle. New Haven: Yale UP, 1994. 92–110.Google Scholar
Kemp, Sandra, and Squires, Judith, eds. Feminisms. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara, and Pearce, Lynne, eds. Feminist Readings / Feminists Reading. 2nd ed. London: Harvester Wheat-sheaf, 1996.Google Scholar
Emma, Parker, ed. Contemporary British Women Writers. Cambridge: Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Lynne, Pearce, ed. Devolving Identities: Feminist Readings in Home and Belonging. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Lynne, Pearce, ed. The Rhetorics of Feminism: Readings in Contemporary Cultural Theory and the Popular Press. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Ruth, Robbins. Literary Feminisms. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar
Jackie, Stacey. Teratologies: A Cultural Study of Cancer. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Warhol, Robyn R., and Herndl, Diane Price, eds. Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. Rev. ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997.10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imelda, Whelehan. The Feminist Bestseller: From Sex and the Single Girl to Sex and the City. London: Palgrave, 2005.Google Scholar