Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:00:21.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marks of Possession: Methods for an Impossible Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

In her 1892 study of children's literature, the child and his book, louise frances field complains, “the subject of this volume is one which, from its nature, presents many difficulties as regards material. It is the fate of children's books to be destroyed by children themselves” (v). Of course, the difficulties of children's literature are not only material. Jacqueline Rose's insistence on the “impossibility of children's fiction” has had the salutary effect of keeping scholars warily attuned to how adult desires—from sex to money to politics—structure the genre. Despite the claim of possession housed in that apostrophe, most scholars of children's literature acknowledge that these books don't really belong to children at all (Hunt). My intention in this essay is to use one of these impossibilities to circumvent the other. I am interested in children's own relation to their reading; I strive to understand not just the books adults produced for children—that is, what adults thought about childhood and wanted to say to children—but also what children actually did with these texts, how they took possession of them. I hope to demonstrate that the penchant for destroying books that Field deplores can provide insight into the literary history of childhood. For this brief essay, I take as my archive the book-destroying habits of the children of one affluent, highly literary family in post–Civil War New England: the niece and nephews of the poet Emily Dickinson—Edward (“Ned”), born in 1861; Martha (“Mattie”), born in 1866; and Thomas Gilbert (“Gib”), born in 1875.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anna, L ——. “Get Up, Nanny!Nursery 6 (1869): 4344. Print.Google Scholar
Barrow, Frances Elizabeth. “Charles and His Ducks.” Nursery 2 (1867): 169–72. Print.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Martha. Letter to Ned Dickinson. [C. 1880]. MS. Martha Dickinson Bianchi Papers, Special Collections, John Hay Lib., Brown U.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Ned. Letter to Susan Dickinson. 11 Jan. 1879. MS. Martha Dickinson Bianchi Papers, Special Collections, John Hay Lib., Brown U.Google Scholar
Elias, Stephen. Alexander T. Stewart: The Forgotten Merchant Prince. Westport: Praeger, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Field, E. M., Mrs. [Louise Frances Field]. The Child and His Book: Some Account of the History and Progress of Children's Literature in England. London: Wells Gardner, 1892. Print.Google Scholar
Godolphin, Mary [Lucy Aiken]. Robinson Crusoe in Words of One Syllable. New York: Routledge, n.d. Print.Google Scholar
Hunt, Peter. Children's Literature: An Illustrated History. New York: Oxford UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Kirk, Connie Ann. “‘Open the Door, They Are Waiting for Me’: An Introduction to the Evergreens Nursery.” Emily Dickinson International Society Bulletin 16.1 (2004): 46. Print.Google Scholar
Mortimer, Favell Lee. Reading without Tears: A Pleasant Mode of Learning to Read. New York: Harper, 1869. Print.Google Scholar
Our Picture Book. Boston: Hollander, n.d. Print.Google Scholar
Rose, Jacqueline. The Case of Peter Pan; or, The Impossibility of Children's Fiction. London: Macmillan, 1984. Print.10.1007/978-1-349-17385-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigourney, Lydia. Letters to Young Ladies. Hartford: Canfield, 1833. Print.Google Scholar
St. Armand, Barton Levi. “Keeper of the Keys: Mary Hampson, the Evergreens, and the Art Within.” The Dickinsons of Amherst: Photographs by Jerome Liebling. Ed. Benfy, Christopher, Longsworth, Polly, and Armand, St. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 2001. 107–67. Print.Google Scholar
Stedman, Edmund Clarence. Rip Van Winkle and His Wonderful Nap. Boston: Fields, 1870. Print.Google Scholar
Uncle, Charles. “John Ray's Performing Dogs.” Nursery 13 (1873): 7174. Print.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah. The Elementary Spelling Book. New York: Cooledge, 1829. Print.Google Scholar
Weil, François. A History of New York. New York: Columbia UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar