Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:23:56.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globality, Difference, and the International Turn in Ecocriticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ursula K. Heise
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Comparative literature has always pursued literary studies in a transnational framework. But for much of its history it has been a “modest intellectual enterprise, fundamentally limited to Western Europe, and mostly revolving around the river Rhine (German philologists working on French literature). Not much more,” as Franco Moretti pithily sums it up (54). The rise of postcolonial theory in the wake of Edward Said's and Gayatri Spivak's influential work vastly expanded comparatist horizons, as did the attention to minority literatures that spread outward from the study of American literature and culture in the 1990s. In 1993 Charles Bernheimer's report to the American Comparative Literature Association, “Comparative Literature at the Turn of the Century,” criticized the elitist and exclusionary tenor of earlier reports on the state of the discipline by Harry Levin (1965) and Tom Greene (1975). Instead, it emphasized “tendencies in literary studies, toward a multicultural, global, and interdisciplinary curriculum” and called for an expansion from comparative literature's traditional focus on a mostly western European and North American canon of works to a truly global conception of Goethean Weltliteratur, for inclusion of previously marginalized minority literatures from around the world, and for connections to media studies, other humanities disciplines, and the social sciences (47).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 128 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 636 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Allen, Bruce. “Facing the True Costs of Living: Arundhati Roy and Ishimure Michiko on Dams and Writing.” Coming into Contact: Explorations in Ecocritical Theory and Practice. Ed. Ingram, Annie Merrill, Marshall, Ian, Philippon, Daniel J., and Sweeting, Adam W. Athens: U of Georgia P, 2007. 154–67. Print.Google Scholar
Behdad, Ali. “What Can American Studies and Comparative Literature Learn from Each Other.” American Literary History 24.3 (2012): 608–17. Print.Google Scholar
Bernheimer, Charles. “The Bernheimer Report, 1993: Comparative Literature at the Turn of the Century.” Bernheimer, Comparative Literature 39-48.Google Scholar
Bernheimer, Charles, ed. Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2009): 197–222. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change.” New Literary History 43.1 (2012): 1–18. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J., and Stoermer, Eugene F. “The ‘Anthropocene.”‘ Global Change Newsletter 41 (2000): 17–18. Print.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. “Comparative Literature, at Last!” Bernheimer, Comparative Literature 117-21.Google Scholar
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth, and Handley, George B. “Toward an Aesthetics of the Earth.” Introduction. DeLoughrey and Handley, Postcolonial Ecologies 3-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLoughrey, Elizabeth, and Handley, George B., eds. Postcolonial Ecologies: Literatures of the Environment. New York: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glotfelty, Cheryll. “Literary Studies in an Age of Environmental Crisis.” Introduction. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Ed. Glotfelty, and Fromm, Harold. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1996. xv-xxxvii. Print.Google Scholar
Gorke, Martin. Artensterben: Von der bkologischen Theorie zum Eigenwert der Natur. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra, and Martínez-Alier, Juan. Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Heise, Ursula K. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. New York: Oxford UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggan, Graham, and Tiffin, Helen. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London: Routledge, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Kern, Robert. “Ecocriticism: What Is It Good For?” ISLE 7.1 (2000): 9–32. Rpt. in The ISLE Reader: Ecocriticism, 1993-2003. Ed. Michael P. Branch and Scott Slovic. Athens: U of Georgia P, 2003. 258-81. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Annette. The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as History and Experience in American Life and Letters. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review 1 (2000): 54–69. Print.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D., ed. Literature of Nature: An International Sourcebook. Chicago: Fitzroy, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppermann, Serpil, Özkan, Ufuk, Özkan, Nevin, and Slovic, Scott. “A Roundtable Discussion on Ecocriticism.” The Future of Ecocriticism: New Horizons. Ed. Oppermann, Özdağ, Özkan, and Slovic. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2011. 459–79. Print.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry. “Is Female to Male As Nature Is to Culture?” Woman, Culture, and Society. Ed. Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist and Lamphere, Louise. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1972. 67–87. Print.Google Scholar
Paravisini-Gebert, Lizabeth. “Deforestation and the Yearning for Lost Landscapes in Caribbean Literature.” DeLoughrey and Handley, Postcolonial Ecologies 99-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary. “Comparative Literature and Global Citizenship.” Bernheimer, Comparative Literature 58-65.Google Scholar
Rose, Deborah Bird. Wild Dog Dreaming: Love and Extinction. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Rose, Deborah Bird, et al. “Thinking Through the Environment, Unsettling the Humanities.” Environmental Humanities 1 (2012): 1–5. Web. 1 Dec. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sörlin, Sverker. “Environmental Humanities: Why Should Biologists Interested in the Environment Take the Humanities Seriously?” BioScience 62.9 (2012): 788–89. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “World Systems and the Creole.” Narrative 14.6 (2006): 102–12. Print.Google Scholar
Thornber, Karen. Ecoambiguity: Environmental Crises and East Asian Literature. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2012. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, Sabine. “Performing Tropics: Alexander von Humboldt's Ansichten der Natur and the Colonial Roots of Nature Writing.” Postcolonial Green: Environmental Politics and World Narratives. Ed. Roos, Bonnie and Hunt, Alex. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2010. 197–212. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Cary. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Yuki, Masami. “‘The Voice of Place’: Soundscapes in Ishimure Michiko's Paradise in the Sea of Sorrow.” Soundscape 3 (2001): 47–53. Print.Google Scholar